Thursday, December 12, 2019

Microeconomics Mathematics and Science

Question: Discuss about the Microeconomics for Mathematics and Science. Answer: Introduction: Predominantly, Mathematics and Science subjects are poorly performed by high school learners in Australia. Also, inadequate funding, inequity is another vice experienced in Australian education institutions as encompassed in the Programme for International student Assessment Report. These issues are being highlighted by an educational reporter from the Sydney Morning Herald. Noteworthy, despite heavy government expenditure on education the result havent helped boost Maths and science performance of learners in Australia (Cook 2016).Australia was ranked 19th in Maths and 16th in science respectively by OECD (OECD Australia,n.d.) Education Expenditure 8 289 USD/student Tertiary 2012-2013 Australia Tertiary 2013 Australia Mathematics performance (PISA) 497 Mean score Mean score 2003-2015 Australia Mean score 2015 Australia Reading performance (PISA) 487Mean score mean score 2000-2015 Australia Mean score 2015 Australia Science performance (PISA) 511 Mean score 2006-2015 Australia However, the world economic forum, competitiveness report recognizes the improvements made in accessibility to advanced education and basic education pillar index by Australia. This was evidenced by positions 8th and 9th respectively (World economic forum, 2016) Shortage of qualified teachers for maths and science has largely contributed to poor scores in the subjects respectively. Also, teaching out of scope by the teachers in Australia is likely to have contributed to the poor Mathematics and science performance (Munro, 2016) Inadequate funding for schools for disabled students contributes to poor performance (Australian Human rights commission, n.d.) Issues are being highlighted to help improve the capacity and quality of experts in mathematics and science subjects for the Australian economy, boost funding, improve education quality and facility, equity and to raise awareness on the inequity levels in Australian schools (Cook, 2016).Primarily, an uneducated taskforce due to poor practice and policy contributes to high unemployment rates and recession. Australia was ranked 6th and 8th for Math and science respectively in 2000 but has dropped to 19th and 16th for science and maths respectively in 2012 Notably, top 15 Australian students had the same score as top 40-50 students in Singapore and Taiwan. Economic Concepts and Analysis. Equity in education implies equal opportunities and resources for all students. However, in some parts of Australia inequity in education institutions has paralyzed the system. Inequity is evidenced by less qualified teaching staff ,high student teacher ratio and few resources thus a competitive disadvantage between them and those learners being taught by qualified resources with adequate education infrastructure.Notably,Australia ranks among the top countries with education inequality. Disadvantaged schools are less than likely to offer proper learning curriculum and opportunities for learners in Australia due to its qualified teacher's shortage (Save our schools, 2017) Notably, allocation inequality is highest in Australia and among the top seven countries worldwide with high teacher student ratio. Also, Australia is ranked 4th with the largest inadequate educational infrastructure. Primarily, Shortage of qualified teachers results in poor education quality in disadvantaged schools. Few teachers imply high student teacher ratio which isnt an ideal situation for better learning experiences hence a competitive disadvantage for students in disadvantaged schoold.Furthermore, inadequate funding leads to few employment opportunities of qualified teachers thus contributing to the overall unemployment levels in the Australian economy. Inadequate funding in education infrastructure has led to fewer learner enrollment figures in Australian schools, higher teacher student ratios, shortage of resources, unemployment and poor learner performance. In addition, shortage of teachers denies learners basic universal access to knowledge and skills. Inevitably, future uneducated labor force resulting from poor education policies and practices cripples chances of employment; increases work redundancy levels and encourages high levels of layoffs. Technological advancements in the workplace today make science and mathematics crucial subjects for future labor market of Australia. Inequalities can be solved by availing equal education opportunities for both advantaged and disadvantaged learners. This can be done through affordable education financial expenses for parents and guardians.Also,widened and easy access to educational and training facilities and making education outcomes dependable on motivation and intelligence will help eliminate inequality(Argy, 2007)Additional funding for the education sector is recommended to further boost its performance. Proper funding will ensure purchase of adequate education facilities and hiring and training of qualified teachers for quality education performance (Harrington, 2007) Furthermore, qualified teachers can be obtained through raising entry standards and teaching curriculum in teacher training institutions.Also,Affordable fees be charged for training teachers.Additionally,professional development courses and achievement awards are likely to motivate teachers to do their jobs efficiently(Harrington, 2007)Morever,implementation of active labor market training programmes are likely to prepare the learners for the future labor market they will be absorbed into in the future thereby reducing long term unemployment ,work redundancies rates ,overall unemployment rates and layoffs in the future labor market of the Australian economy. Conclusion Undeniably, Australia s education sector requires improvements this can be evidenced by the low score for the Programme for international student Assessment s results for Mathematics and Science at 25 and 14 respectively according to OECD Report. However, Australia s score was way above OECD s average. Learner inequality evidenced by the shortage of qualified teachers and the high teacher-student ratio has resulted in general poor learner performance in Australia. Inadequate funding of education facilities has caused competitive inequality between advantaged and disadvantaged learners in Australia. Lastly, inadequate funding cripples purchase of essential teaching equipment and aids thus a disadvantage for learners.Also,inadequate funding can result in employment of unqualified teaching staff hence unqualified teaching hence which inevitably translates to poor learner performance and poor education quality. Less funding also leads to few employment opportunities due to low salary budget for employers. Additionally, insufficient funding denies disabled students access to quality basic universal education hence general poor performance in mathematics and science in Australia. Primarily, Funding, cost, academic and training qualifications of teachers largely affect learner performance in Australia. Reference List Argy, F. (2007).Education Inequalities in Australia. University of Western Australia. [Online] Available at https://www.ias.uwa.edu.au/new-critic/five/educationinequalities[Accessed on 10 Apr.2017] Australian High Commission for Human Rights .Access to education for student with Disabilities; Barriers and Difficulties. Australian High Commission for Human Rights. [Online] Available at https://www.humanrights.gov.au/publications/access-education-students-disability-barriers-and-difficulties[Accessed 10 Apr.2017] Cook, H. (2016).What is the problem with Australian Schools?. The Sydney Morning Herald. [Online] Available at https://www.smh.com.au/national/what-is-the-problem-with-australian-schools-20160511-gosmbw.html [Accessed 10 Apr.2017] Harrington, M. Improving School Performance. The Achievement of Australia School Students. Parliament of Australia. [Online] Available at https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/BriefingBook44p/SchoolPerformance[Accessed 10 Apr.2017] Munhro.K. (2016).Why is Australia s Education System Going Backwards? The Sydney Morning Herald. [Online] Available at https://www.smh.com.au/national/education/why-is-australias-education-system-going-backwards-20161208-gt6van.html.[Accessed 10 Apr.2017] OECD. Data: Australia. Selected indicators for Australia.OECD. [Online]Available at https://data.oecd.org/australia.htm[Accessed on 10 Apr.2017] Save our Schools. (2017). Fighting for equity in schools; the struggle is long but hope is longer. Save our schools. [Online] Available at https://www.saveourschools.com.au/equity-in-education/resource-gaps-between-advantaged-disadvantaged-schools-among-the-largest-in-the-world[Accessed 10 Apr.2017] World Economic Forum. Country Highlights. [Online] Available at https://reports.weforum.org/global-competitiveness-report-2015-2016/country-highlights/[Accessed 10.Apr.2017]

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.